Pragmatism Today

HOME | EDITORIAL & ADVISORY BOARDS | CURRENT ISSUE | CALL FOR PAPERS | GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS | ARCHIVES | LINKS

 

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS

Articles should be written in a straightforward style that is accessible to intelligent but general readers. Although the PT is regularly visited by professional philosophers, many readers of the PT are philosophy students or philosophically curious web surfers. To best serve these latter users, authors should minimize unnecessary technical vocabulary.

  1. Use The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition.
  2. An abstract should be also submitted.
  3. Length should be between 10,000 - 20,000 words with 1.5 line space.
  4. Please use the automatic footnote function. Papers with footnotes inserted as normal text at the end of the document will not be accepted.
  5. Authors who are non-native English speakers have the responsibility to submit articles that do not read like broken English, and that are stylistically intelligible to native English speakers. Many of our foreign authors recruit English-speaking proofreaders before submitting their articles. The editing process will proceed much more quickly and easily if your papers are worked through by a native speaker first.

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Editors’ duties

Publication decisions
The editor of the journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. Based on the review report of the editors and referees, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and the advice of other editors and reviewers of the journal, and is constrained by legal requirements as shall then be in force.

Fair play
An editor will at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political views of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff shall not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Reviewers’ duties

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors or institutions connected to the papers.

Authors’ duties

Originality
To avoid plagiarism and misquotation, the authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
In case the paper overlaps significantly in content with a previous publication by the same author, the editor of this journal has to agree to the publication, permission must be obtained by the copyright holder of the original source and the original source has to be acknowledged. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the preparation of the submitted article. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Reporting standards
Underlying data to any quantitative statement should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work or check information. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to prepare an erratum or addenda, and/or retract the original publication.


Subscribe to our

RSS (version 1.0)
RSS (version 2.0)

CEPF

Emancipation: Challenges at the Intersection of American and European Philosophy

Booking.com

pragmatism

Copyright © 2010 - 2017 CEPF - Central European Pragmatist Forum | ISSN 1338-2799 | Made in Europe